Article page checkbox is not checked in page info.
Market stability reserve for the EU’s emissions trading system: Ceasing the invalidation of allowances
Market stability reserve for the EU's emissions trading system: Ceasing the invalidation of allowances
Juan Fernando López Hernández, Members' Research Service
Summary
The market stability reserve (MSR) is governed by Decision (EU) 2015/1814, which aims to safeguard against substantial fluctuations in market volumes by adjusting the supply of allowances in the carbon market. In the EU emissions trading system (EU ETS), the reserve has been in operation since 2019. The European Commission proposed on 1 April 2026 to amend the MSR in view of ceasing the invalidation of allowances. The proposal seeks to enhance the MSR's capacity to better address future supply shortages or price volatility, while maintaining the EU ETS's market rule-based framework. During its September part-session, the European Parliament is due to debate and vote on its position on the Commission's proposal.
Background
The MSR is a volume-based instrument. If a lower threshold of a total number of allowances in circulation is achieved in the carbon market, allowances are taken out from the MSR and brought back into the carbon market, thus increasing the supply of allowances. Conversely, if an upper threshold is achieved, EU allowances are deducted from the quantity to be auctioned and sent to the MSR. Based on Article 1(5a) of Decision (EU) 2015/1814, allowances held in the reserve above 400 million allowances are no longer valid, meaning they cannot be re-used for adjusting supply in the carbon market. Since 2023, 3.2 billion allowances have been cancelled from the MSR due to the 'invalidation rule'.
European Commission proposal
The Commission proposes to remove the invalidation rule to enable additional allowances to enter the carbon market, thereby creating a liquidity buffer in case additional allowances are required to address a supply shortage.
European Parliament position
In Parliament, the Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food Safety (ENVI) is responsible for the file. On11 June 2026, the rapporteur tabled a draft report, which he presented during the ENVI committee meeting of 6 July. The rapporteur, who is also ENVI committee chair, suggested not to modify the Commission proposal at that stage, proposing instead to examine the Commission proposal amending the MSR alongside the broader Commission proposal to revise Directive 2003/87/EC on the EU ETS, which was subsequently tabled on 17 July. ENVI committee members were thus able to submit their amendments to the proposal to amend the MSR as regards ceasing the invalidation of allowances in light of the broader proposal of 17 July.
On 10 September, the ENVI committee adopted its final report. The report proposes increasing the threshold triggering the invalidation mechanism from 400 million to 650 million allowances – allowances above that would no longer be valid – and suggests that the new threshold take effect on 1 March 2027.
First-reading report: 2026/0085(COD); Committee responsible: ENVI; Rapporteur: Pierfrancesco Maran (S&D, Italy). For further information see our Legislative Train Schedule.
Classification
Policy areas: Environment
Regions: European Union
Committees: Environment, Climate and Food Safety (ENVI)
Statement on the use of AI
Any AI-generated content in this text has been reviewed by the author(s).
Disclaimer
This document is prepared for, and addressed to, the Members and staff of the European Parliament as background material to assist them in their parliamentary work. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of its author(s) and any opinions expressed herein should not be taken to represent an official position of the Parliament.
Copyright
© European Union.
The reuse of this document is authorised under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) licence.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
To use or reproduce elements that are not owned by the European Union, permission may need to be sought directly from the respective rightsholders.