Article page checkbox is not checked in page info.
Options Brief_EP Academic Freedom Monitor 2025: Key findings and policy options
EP Academic Freedom Monitor 2025 Key findings and policy options
Marika Armanovica, Scientific Foresight Unit
Summary
The European Parliament Academic Freedom Monitor 2025 provides an overview of the state of academic freedom across all European Union Member States. Academic freedom is essential to the mission of higher education and research, to the fundamental principles of academia, in Europe and elsewhere, and as a prerequisite for well-functioning democratic societies.
This year's monitor includes a general update, based on recent scores and reports, as well as an in-depth analysis of public debate in four selected countries – Belgium, Finland, Italy and Poland – which serves to identify key trends. Four selected trends with a potential impact on academic freedom in the EU are discussed in detail: political polarisation, recent developments in the higher education and research system in the United States, the commercialisation of academia, and foreign interference.
The findings show that from a global perspective, respect for academic freedom in the EU remains relatively high, but it continues nevertheless to come under pressure in most of the EU. Of all the academic freedom components examined, the freedom to teach and conduct research, and institutional autonomy, are estimated to be the most affected. The policy options proposed in the context of last year's edition of the Monitor remain pertinent, but the new findings require a set of additional novel policy options.
Statement of purpose
This document is based on the STOA study 'Academic Freedom Monitor 2025: Analysis of academic freedom trends in the EU'. The study has been written by Peter Maassen (University of Oslo), Vasiliki Kosta (Leiden University), Paola Mattei (University of Milano), Olga Ceran (Leiden University), Dennis Martinsen (University of Oslo), and Lazar Živanić (University of Milano) at the request of the Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA), and managed by the Scientific Foresight Unit, within the Directorate General for Parliamentary Research Services (EPRS), European Parliament. STOA administrator responsible: Marika Armanovica.
Key findings
Analysis of trends in academic freedom (disregarding any legal developments) in the EU Member States has yielded the following key findings:
-
Although the state of de facto academic freedom in the EU is generally better than in other world regions, academic freedom is under pressure in almost all EU Member States. The two aspects of academic freedom estimated to be subject to most pressure in EU Member States are the freedom to teach and conduct research, and institutional autonomy.
-
The estimated state of academic freedom has declined significantly over the past decade (2014-2024) in eight EU Member States: Austria, Finland, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Lithuania, Poland and Portugal.
-
Direct and indirect political interference continues to pose a significant threat to academic freedom in the EU. Moreover, several EU Member States have accorded lower priority to higher education and academic research in their policies and budgets. This has contributed to increasing pressure on academic freedom.
-
There are concerns about increasing internal tension and conflict within academia in several EU Member States. These concerns are related to factors including, but not limited to, political polarisation and geopolitical conflict. Such tension and conflict, which often leads to attempts to silence dissenting voices, opinions and ideas, can have a detrimental impact on academic freedom.
-
Political polarisation in EU Member States has the potential to erode public trust in academia, thereby increasing pressure on academic freedom. One of the expressions of such pressure is the increasing number of attacks on academics and academic institutions via social media.
-
Respect for academic freedom is under severe political pressure in the US. This poses threats and opportunities, as well as responsibilities, for the EU.
-
The growing reliance of the academic sector on non-public funding could increase pressure on academic freedom, particularly in the context of public budget cuts in many EU Member States. There is a general lack of transparent and clear European guidelines for developing sound partnerships with private and non-traditional public actors that respect academic freedom.
-
Intensifying geopolitical tensions have resulted in increased foreign interference and undesirable transfer and use of European knowledge and technologies. The resulting challenges within the European academic community – for instance, with regard to the assessment and management of research security risks and the development of responsible international collaborations and partnerships – could have a negative impact on academic freedom. It also emphasises the necessity for Europe to address the strategic importance of data sovereignty.
-
The increased political awareness of the erosion of academic freedom in the EU Member States has, to date, not been sufficiently followed by appropriate new regulations, guidelines, or effective platforms and support structures at European, national and institutional levels.
Policy options
Addressing threats to academic freedom is highly relevant for the EU as a geopolitical union, its global competitiveness and collaboration in science, as well as for safeguarding Europe's values and way of life.
Tackling all issues identified in the study at the EU level is not feasible. Protecting academic freedom is the responsibility not only of the EU, but also of national public authorities, institutional leadership and the academic community at large. Consequently, the policy options proposed in this year's monitor have been made considering their potential relevance for possible EU-level legislation and non-legislative initiatives.
As the state of academic freedom in most of the EU continues to gradually erode, the EU seeks to address this erosion by strengthening the protection and promotion of academic freedom through initiatives such as the proposed European Research Area (ERA) act. However, the multifaceted nature of trends and the growing diversity across the EU Member States, whether in de facto or de jure academic freedom, pose additional challenges.
As regards education policies, the EU's formal competence is limited to a supplementary role that excludes the harmonisation of national legislation. However, to contribute to the protection of academic freedom, various channels for action are available to the EU. The EU therefore offers support measures in education and participates in intergovernmental processes, such as the Bologna Process and the European Higher Education Area (EHEA).
The 2024 Academic Freedom Monitor proposed seven policy options:
-
Exploring further the scope and nature of academic freedom as an EU fundamental right;
-
Strengthening existing European legal frameworks for promoting and protecting academic freedom;
-
Enhancing awareness of definitions and interpretations of academic freedom;
-
Developing the EP Academic Freedom Monitor;
-
Better integration of academic freedom into EU higher education, research, development and innovation;
-
Conducting meta-analysis of academic freedom data;
-
Enhancing the knowledge base and deepening understanding.
It can be argued that all these policy options remain relevant and therefore deserve careful consideration by policymakers. Nevertheless, the results of this year's monitoring study indicate emergent trends that necessitate new approaches and measures. Consequently, in addition to the policy options above, a set of novel policy options has been identified this year.
Additional policy options based on the 2025 report:
New policy option 1: Developing and implementing transparent and clear strategies and guidelines for responding to foreign interference and handling research security risks in international scientific collaboration
The legislative and regulatory environment for academia has changed in response to increased foreign interference in academia and research risks related to undesirable transfer of knowledge and technologies. However, these changes at national level differ significantly and have in turn led to divergent institutional approaches and practices across EU Member States. In this context, it is essential that the EU highlights the key priorities for managing and limiting foreign interference in European, national and institutional contexts within the EU, and that it promotes and supports good practice. For this purpose, a specialised expert body at European level could be established. To be effective, this expert body could be expected to interact and work closely with national expert bodies, such as the Dutch Contact Point for Knowledge Security and the German Centre for International Academic Cooperation (KIWi).
In addition to such a structure, a specialised knowledge security unit could be established within each academic institution for staff and students. This single point-of-contact arrangement would encompass the European, national and institutional levels. This would address the problem that academic staff, students, and their institutions generally lack the knowledge and insight needed to make informed decisions regarding foreign interference and research security risks, necessitating external guidance from the national authorities and the EU.
New policy option 2: Developing a European strategy for promoting Europe as a core region for protecting and promoting academic freedom
The declining respect for academic freedom in the US leaves Europe as the world's main science region actively promoting and protecting academic freedom. To continue, this requires a new European strategy. Such a strategy would facilitate the safeguarding of academic freedom within EU Member States against unwarranted interference from the US and other countries and demonstrate that Europe actively promotes and safeguards academic freedom in the context of international scientific collaboration. A potential element of this strategy might be the forming of a new strategic global alliance between the EU and countries that actively support and protect academic freedom in their science systems.
New policy option 3: Developing and implementing adequate measures to counter the impact of political polarisation on academic freedom
Political polarisation poses specific challenges for EU Member States' public authorities regarding the promotion and protection of fundamental European values within society at large and academia in particular. In many EU Member States, academic freedom is subject to pressure from direct or indirect political interference. This pressure has increased in countries experiencing political polarisation or even anti-science movements, where illiberal democratic governments have deprioritised higher education and academic research in their governmental programmes and budgets and/or openly discredited academic research and institutions. Consequently, strengthening the support for national government agencies, institutional leadership and management, and academic staff and student associations could be considered in addressing the potential negative impacts of political polarisation on academic freedom. This concerns both the 'post-illiberalism' context and the need to strengthen the institutional foundations of academic freedom under 'liberal democracy' regimes.
Statement on the use of AI
Any AI-generated content in this text has been reviewed by the author(s).
Disclaimer
This document is prepared for, and addressed to, the Members and staff of the European Parliament as background material to assist them in their parliamentary work. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of its author(s) and any opinions expressed herein should not be taken to represent an official position of the Parliament.
Copyright
© European Union.
The reuse of this document is authorised under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) licence.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
To use or reproduce elements that are not owned by the European Union, permission may need to be sought directly from the respective rightsholders.